The cartoonish corruption of the Supreme Court

Here’s the link to this article.

Avatar photoby ADAM LEE

AUG 28, 2023

Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas | The cartoonish corruption of the Supreme Court
Credit: Wikimedia Commons/public domain

Overview:

The archconservative justices of the Supreme Court have been enjoying a steady stream of gifts and luxury travel from right-wing billionaire friends. What checks and balances are there for a corrupt judiciary?

Reading Time: 6 MINUTES

Let’s stipulate one thing to start: I don’t doubt that some people call themselves conservative because they believe in small government, low taxes and individual freedom.

However, even granting this, it’s hard to argue that this is the animating idea of the American conservative movement as it exists today. Based on the policies they support, it’s plain to see that its organizing principle is very different. Namely, conservatism appears most concerned with protecting the privileged class—wealthy, white, male Christians for the most part—and ensuring they can do whatever they want. Meanwhile, they want to subject everyone else to increasingly harsh, oppressive and arbitrary laws.

Donald Trump’s shameless attempts to exploit the presidency for his own profit—about which Republicans raised not a peep of protest—are the most glaring example. However, those efforts were unusual only in that they were so brazen. He didn’t pioneer the tactic. He only engaged in it after lesser lights of conservatism had been getting away with it for years.

With that in mind, let’s talk about Clarence Thomas.

Me and my billionaire friends

Thomas has been on the Supreme Court since 1991. He’s one of its most conservative justices, voting against abortion, against gay rights, against gun control, against church-state separation.

Thanks to reporting by ProPublica, we also know that he’s been living large for years on a steady stream of gifts from conservative billionaires. The plutocrats who’ve lavished their wealth on him include Harlan Crow, a Texas real estate mogul; Paul Novelly, an oil baron; David Sokol, a private equity manager; and Wayne Huizenga, a CEO and investor.

In fact, “gifts” is a massive understatement. That word implies a small wrapped package, like something that would fit under a Christmas tree. The gifts that Clarence Thomas has been receiving are of an entirely different order. They’re entrance tickets into a rarefied millionaire lifestyle that the average American can only dream of.

They include flights on private jets and sailing trips on superyachts; VIP passes and skybox seats to sporting events; stays at ultra-luxury hotels, parties at waterfront mansions, and trips to exclusive resorts for the ultrarich. Crow bought several real-estate properties from Thomas and paid the tuition for Thomas’ grandnephew, whom he was raising as a son, to attend private school. He’s even bankrolled Thomas’ insurrectionist wife, Ginni, and her far-right lobbying group Liberty Central (whose mere existence poses its own massive conflicts of interest).

Like clockwork, Thomas’ leisure activities have been underwritten by benefactors who share the ideology that drives his jurisprudence. Their gifts include:

At least 38 destination vacations, including a previously unreported voyage on a yacht around the Bahamas; 26 private jet flights, plus an additional eight by helicopter; a dozen VIP passes to professional and college sporting events, typically perched in the skybox; two stays at luxury resorts in Florida and Jamaica; and one standing invitation to an uber-exclusive golf club overlooking the Atlantic coast.“Clarence Thomas’ 38 Vacations: The Other Billionaires Who Have Treated the Supreme Court Justice to Luxury Travel.” Brett Murphy and Alex Mierjeski, ProPublica, 10 August 2023.

Thomas has mentioned none of this in his yearly financial disclosures. But don’t worry, his billionaire friends swear that they’ve never discussed business on any of their little trips:

In a statement to ProPublica, Sokol said he’s been close friends with the Thomases for 21 years and acknowledged traveling with and occasionally hosting them. He defended the justice as upright and ethical. “We have never once discussed any pending court matter,” Sokol said. “Our conversations have always revolved around helping young people, sports, and family matters.”

Except:

Last October, in New Orleans, Sokol made a direct reference to a pending Supreme Court case while addressing a group of former Horatio Alger scholarship recipients. (Thomas was not in attendance.)

The speech veered into territory that made many of those in attendance uncomfortable and left others appalled, emails and others messages show. Sokol, who has written extensively about American exceptionalism and the virtues of free enterprise, minimized slavery and systemic racism, some felt. He then criticized President Joe Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan, arguing Biden had overstepped the government’s authority, according to a recording of the speech obtained by ProPublica.

“It’s going to get overturned by the Supreme Court,” Sokol predicted, echoing a common legal commentary.

He was right. This summer, the court struck down Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan. Thomas voted in the majority.

This poses the obvious question: Was Sokol only guessing at what the court was going to rule? Or did he have insider knowledge from chatting with his buddy?

It’s not just Thomas going for a dip in the waters of corruption, either. Samuel Alito, another of the court’s archconservatives, went on an extravagant Alaska fishing trip with hedge fund billionaire Paul Singer. Singer flew him there on a private jet costing $100,000 each way and paid for his stay at a $1,000-a-night luxury lodge.

It was a profitable investment:

In 2014, the court agreed to resolve a key issue in a decade-long battle between Singer’s hedge fund and the nation of Argentina. Alito did not recuse himself from the case and voted with the 7-1 majority in Singer’s favor. The hedge fund was ultimately paid $2.4 billion.“Justice Samuel Alito Took Luxury Fishing Vacation With GOP Billionaire Who Later Had Cases Before the Court.” Justin Elliott, Joshua Kaplan and Alex Mierjeski. ProPublica, 20 June 2023.

Like Thomas, Alito didn’t disclose this trip until it was uncovered by reporters. He claimed that “personal hospitality” is exempt from disclosure requirements. This is a willfully dishonest misreading of the law.

An awareness of impropriety

The legal system has a de minimis rule, which states that some acts are too insignificant for the law to concern itself with. If I invite my friend over for dinner at my house and spend $30 on some hamburgers to grill and a six-pack of beer, that would arguably fall under the de minimis exemption.

However, if I instead invite my friend to a catered party at my multimillion-dollar vacation estate, pick him up on a private plane, and hire a celebrity chef to cook for us both, that’s not de minimis. Any reasonable person can see that there’s a vast and significant difference.

The fact that the justices didn’t report these trips suggests an awareness of impropriety. They knew it would give critics grounds to question their impartiality.

The fact that the justices didn’t report these trips suggests an awareness of impropriety.

There doesn’t even have to be an explicit quid pro quo. Any reasonable person can understand that if a Supreme Court justice is personal friends with a billionaire who showers him with gifts, favors and luxury vacations—how likely is it that said justice will vote against his friend’s desires? There can be an implicit, yet still completely obvious, understanding that if they stopped ruling the way their benefactors wanted, the stream of gifts would dry up.

While I don’t think judges should have to take a vow of poverty or live in seclusion like monks, it’s common sense that they should step back from any case which they have a personal connection to. That rule applies if a case before the court involves one of your friends. It also applies if the case involves the conservative think tank your friend has donated tens of millions of dollars to, or the Fortune 500 company whose board of directors your friend sits on, or the dark-money lobbying group your friend underwrites.

In short, if you befriend ultrarich people who have their fingers in many different pies, you should have to accept there’s a much wider spectrum of cases you have to disqualify yourself from. But the conservatives want to have their cake and eat it, too. They want to enjoy the lavish “hospitality” of their wealthy friends, but they also want to keep ruling on cases that concern them. It’s bribery and corruption in the purest sense of the word.

Checks and balances

Much like Donald Trump, these conservative justices are acting as if the law is beneath them. They’re treating their office not as a position of public trust, but as a sinecure they’re entitled to exploit for their own benefit and to do favors for their friends. This would be bad enough in any political office, but it’s especially shocking and revolting with judges appointed to life terms who never have to face the corrective will of the voters.

The simplest Constitutional cure for this rampant corruption is impeachment. Unfortunately, the prospects of that are dim. It takes a two-thirds majority of the Senate to remove a judge from office. In our polarized era, it’s clear that Republican senators value power above all.

Unlike in the days of Nixon, there will never be enough of them who’ll vote to remove a justice of their own party. As long as the Supreme Court’s conservatives keep voting the way they want, they’ll turn a blind eye to corruption or malfeasance, just as they’ve done with Donald Trump.

However, there are other reforms that can be made with a simple majority. For one, Congress could add new justices to the court to counteract the influence of the bad ones.

Or it could impose a mandatory retirement age. That’s a good idea in any case, as lifetime appointments to any office make a mockery of democracy. The judiciary needs regular turnover to keep up with the changing norms of society’s moral consensus. And, of course, it offers a useful test: will those GOP megadonors keep pouring their largesse on their “friends” when they no longer have anything to gain by it?

The Boaz Stranger–Chapter 46

I extracted myself from the Lazy Boy and stood beside Lillian’s bed, wishing she was alert and healed. I needed her by my side, no matter what Jane Fordham was about to say.

My cell vibrated. Again, it was Kyla. She suggested we meet in the cafeteria instead of the small waiting room outside ICU. I agreed, kissed Lillian on the cheek, and walked outside her room, nodding to Stella Newsome sitting at the nurses’ station.

***

Kyla was paying the cashier for coffee when I entered the cafeteria. I was confident sis would buy me a cup, so I turned right to the open table next to the windows along the outside wall. Naturally, I chose the best seat, the one that presented a full view of the entire dining room. It was a habit that was hard to break.

I watched Jane as she paid the cashier. She was not wearing her red, close-cropped wig. Her hair was gray, bordering on white. I wondered if she kept her natural hair cut short or if she still suffered from the effects of two rounds of chemo, she’d endured a few years ago.

I pondered Lillian, and Dr. Mork’s encouraging statement while staring at the saltshaker, waiting for Kyla and Jane to reach our table. Instead of sitting, Kyla handed me a large coffee and announced she was heading to the ICU. Our eyes met, and she gave me a slight nod of encouragement. Or, it might have been a “brother, you’re on your own” look.

Jane sat in the chair to my right and offered me one of two bran muffins she’d bought. I declined, and she asked about Lillian. I shared Dr. Mork’s words and rejected any temptation to drift deeper into small talk. Jane thanked me for my willingness to meet.

I took this as an open gate to race forward. I couldn’t suppress my legal training and its natural quest for logical reasoning. “Kyla tells me you want to help.” I took my second sip of coffee. It was still too hot for my liking. I removed the lid and let the steam escape.

“I do, and I know you’re skeptical. As you should be.” I glanced at Jane as she stared at her coffee. She, unlike Kyla and Lillian, wasn’t aging well. There were lively crow’s feet engulfing both eyes, and gravity was doing its thing at both corners of her mouth.

“It might have something to do with the lies you told me when we talked on the phone.”

“I was just trying to protect you.” I raised my eyebrows and stared at Jane. Her statement made little sense. “I know that sounds crazy, but, in one sense, telling you Rachel had an abortion seemed easier to swallow than dealing with her child, Elita.” I noted Jane mentioned nothing about Kyle.

Kyla had told me she admitted to Jane that Lillian and I had gone prowling in her house and had seen Jane’s war-room, as sis labeled it. “I prefer the truth, no matter how painful.” This sounded righteous to me. And it was probably false. I suspect there are plenty of potential scenarios where the truth would be worse.

It was like Jane showed up. Rachel had said more than once over the years that Jane was the smartest person she’d ever met. I’d never given it much thought, or credence. The woman two feet from me sat straighter in her chair and angled her body to square her shoulders directly at me. Symbolically, as though she was penetrating my skull, she poured her piercing green eyes into mine. Her body language said she was ready to debate, or duel if need be. “Let’s be brutally honest. What you found in my study shocked you. I’m sure I could have conducted myself more honorably concerning Rachel’s child and many other things, but I’m here now, with more secrets to share, if you can forget the past and move forward.”

“That’s fine with me, but I have two conditions. One, you acknowledge and agree with my goals. By the way, they are the same as Lillian’s, Kent’s, and Mrs. Bennett’s. And Kyla’s, to be thorough. Second, you must earn my trust. I need more than words. I need you to show by your actions that you are trustworthy.” My coffee was better now.

Jane must have eyes on the side of her head. She caught sight of Stella Newsome as she entered the cafeteria. The nurse didn’t look our way. “I’ll agree, but why don’t you lay out the goals. I feel I know what you’re after, but I want to be crystal clear about what I’m agreeing to.”

“That’s fair. The top priority is to see that Kyle gets his long overdue justice. A close second would be justice for the family of Sharon Teague. I assume you are familiar with this case. Actually, it’s a few weeks or months older than Kyle’s.”

Jane didn’t answer my question. “Any other goals?”

“One, maybe two more. The first concerns the Hunt House fire. The arsonist needs to be convicted, not to belittle the death of Eric Snyder and his need for justice. From your conversation with Kyla, you know that Lillian and I believe Ray Archer is the mastermind behind the fire.” I paused for Jane to ponder.

She stared again at Stella, who was now dealing with the cashier. Jane turned her head back to me. “You said there might be another goal.”

“It’s now public knowledge Billy and Buddy James are missing. Today’s Sand Mountain Reporter has a lengthy article about them, including their friendship with Eric Snyder, and their last known whereabouts. The paper says they are people of interest concerning the Hunt House fire. To me, its apparent Ray had a motive to get rid of the twin brothers.”

Jane finished her first muffin and wadded up the paper wrapping. “That’s a bunch of goals, so why don’t you ask whatever questions you have. I’ll answer to the best of my knowledge and ability.”

“Before we go there, let’s revisit our phone conversation. I need truthful answers to the two questions I asked. Let’s start with the night Kyle disappeared.”

Before I could complete my question, Jane interrupted, “Kyle was still in the truck when Ray dropped me off at home.”

“I thought so, but let’s come back to that night a little later. Now, tell me the truth about Rachel’s abortion.” I was sure I knew the answer, since I’d seen the photo of Rachel holding a newborn in a Hong Kong hospital, but I wanted to make sure I wasn’t missing something, like another pregnancy or another opportunity for an abortion.

“Rachel never had an abortion. You saw the picture. She lied to Ray about having one before she and her family left for China in the tenth grade.”

“And she was pregnant just the one time?”

Jane seemed semi-pissed that I’d ask such a question. “Well, of course.”

“And Ray was the father, Elita’s father?”

“Yes. Rachel never had sex with anyone but Ray.” I wanted to ask how she could know this but opted to keep my question to myself. Jane picked at her second muffin and continued, staring at me again with those piercing green eyes. “I’m sorry I lied to you. I promise, from now on, I’ll be truthful, no matter how difficult or embarrassing your questions.”

Dr. Mork entered the cafeteria and walked toward Jane and me. Two tables before he reached us, he sat with an older couple, clutched their hands, lowered his head, and prayed. Or so it seemed. “Thanks. Now, one other question before we discuss the goals. Do you know who broke into my house in New Haven and stole Rachel’s diaries?”

Without hesitation, Jane said, “Ray was the snake’s head, but a friend, associate, whatever, of Ted King performed the slithering. He did it as a favor to Ray.” I liked Jane’s metaphor and she sounded believable. But I wanted to follow-up, anyway.

“How do you know this?”

Jane seemed distracted by Dr. Mork’s tuned-up volume. His prayer was intense. She turned back to me. “I believe in prayer but there’s a time and place, and it’s not here.”

I didn’t take the bait, if that’s what it was.

“Pillow talk. Well, it plays a minor role, but mostly from my friend Vanessa Clausen.” Jane used her second muffin as a pause button. “Let’s not go down that rat hole right now or we’ll be here till lunch. For now, just know that Vanessa’s husband, Barry, does some odd jobs for Ted King.”

Again, I refrained from getting sidetracked, although it was tempting. Why in hell would Barry help Ray, the man who’d banged his wife since early high school? I could only assume Barry wasn’t privy to that little detail. “So, what did Ray do with Rachel’s diaries?”

“He gave them to me. Ray doesn’t have the patience to read.”

“Did you?”

Jane raised her eyebrows and stared my way. “Yes, I have the patience and yes, I read them. Now, they’re locked inside Ray’s office. Along with my diaries and all the wall decor you saw while snooping around inside my house.”

“I assume this means you told Ray about Lillian and me discovering your decorated walls?”

“I did.” I stared straight at her and drummed my fingers on the table, hoping Jane would feel the need to describe her and Ray’s relationship. Jane would obviously know that Lillian and I had seen her and Ray’s high school dance photo.

Thankfully, she was perceptive. “Therefore, trust me. I’m willing to give up a lot to help you and Lillian. You’ve probably already figured out that I’ve been in love with Ray since high school. Thanks to Rachel.”

“Because she persuaded Ray to take you to the Valentine’s Dance?” It was like Jane, and I were playing chess, talking about our future moves before revealing our next one.

Two could play this game. “You fell for Ray when Rachel moved away, but to him it was just business.” I paused as she considered her next move. “Sorry to be so blunt, but you got what you wanted and so did he. It just wasn’t the same thing.”

Jane shook her head sideways and rolled her eyes. “You’re too smart for your own good.” Without skipping a beat, she again stood. “Want some more coffee?”

I declined. After she returned and sat, I didn’t hesitate to be bold, and knife edged. “You’ve been living a lie for physical intimacy?” I could be bolder. “In exchange for sex, you protected Ray?”

Jane’s face turned red, but she plowed ahead, undaunted. “Those days are over. That train has left the station. He’s headed to destruction and I’m afraid.” Snakes and trains, Jane liked her metaphors.

“Please explain.”

“You may not want to hear this, but I have more than one motive to help. Ray is in eliminate mode, and no one knows more than me. He’ll silence me, anyone who has the potential of exposing him.”

“Like Billy and Buddy?” I had no actual evidence of my accusation, but my education and experience fed my drive. It seemed only logical that Ray orchestrated their disappearance. Buddy had helped Ray burn the Hunt House. Buddy could cut a deal with the DA and leave Ray hanging. Now, I’d bet he’s dead. Ray had eliminated Buddy, maybe Billy too, just like he’d eliminated Kyle fifty years ago.

“Yes. Do you want to get into that now, or stick to the diaries and my wall decor?” Jane knew how to keep a conversation on track.

“We can come back to the diaries. Did Ray kill Billy and Buddy?”

“I don’t know for sure, but I’m highly suspicious.”

“Why?”

Jane told me how she’d disabled Ray’s ankle monitor, providing details I didn’t need to know. That was last Saturday. Later, she’d gone to visit Rosa and dropped by The Shack for a takeout order before heading home. There, inside the restaurant, she’d seen Ray and waited in her car. After two hours, she’d almost given up, but Ray and Ted King exited around 9:30, with both leaving in separate vehicles. Jane had followed Ray. He had driven to Dogwood Trail in a steadily increasing rain. Jane had hidden her car in a grove of trees and again waited on Ray. She knew he’d eventually have to exit the one-way road. Around 11:30, a pickup truck turned right onto Dogwood Trail. After another long wait, Ray, in his Suburban, approached the stop sign at the intersection of Dogwood Trail and Cox Gap Road, but instead of turning left to Hwy. 431, he turned right. What was stranger still was that he was pulling a flatbed trailer loaded with the same pickup that she had seen earlier. Jane had followed Ray all the way down the mountain to Attalla, where he proceeded south on I-59. After reaching the Ashville exit, Jane had returned home, not knowing where Ray was heading.

Sunday, Jane had conducted research and determined that Buddy owned a blue Chevrolet pickup, the same one she’d seen atop Ray’s flatbed trailer traveling south on Interstate 59.

Just as I was midway asking Jane if Ray had said anything about the Hunt House fire, she jumped up and literally ran to catch up with Stella exiting the cafeteria. It was five minutes before she returned.

“One other thought I had about last Saturday night. Earlier that afternoon, at the Lodge, I was sitting at his desk doing some final research on disabling his ankle monitor.”

I couldn’t resist interjecting, “trading favors.”

Jane shook her head and mouthed, “don’t go there, lurid details won’t get us anywhere.” I credited my nonsensical statement to my lethargy.

“Sorry, that was uncalled for and I’m thankful for your willingness to be open.”

“Next to Ray’s computer was a real estate flier advertising the Dogwood Trail farm for sale. You know his father is the legal owner?”

“I’ve heard that.”

“Anyway, I made a comment, something like, ‘I didn’t know you were selling your farm.’ Ray’s response seemed normal at the time, and I didn’t give it any thought. Until later that night.”

“What did he say?”

“I’m not. I’m trying to buy it. That was until my asshole father refused to sell it to me, and now he’s received an offer.” Jane fiddled with her iPhone and exchanged a quick text with someone. “This got me to thinking. Ray walked out of his office and back into his bedroom, but I heard him mumble. ‘I wish the weather would clear up. I’ve got stuff I need to move.’”

I couldn’t help but recall what Rachel had written in one of her diaries, that Ray had something to hide. “What were your thoughts?”

“That the sixty acres would have been a safe and private place to dispose of Sharon Teague’s body.”

“Or Kyle Bennett’s.” I added. Even though Rachel had written almost this exact thing, I guess I didn’t believe her. Especially after discovering her diary inside the wall at the Hunt House. The two supposedly covered the same time period but were anything but consistent.

Jane looked me straight in the eye and shook her head sideways. “No, I’m pretty sure Kyle’s not there.”

“Why do you say that?”

“That’s too obvious. Rachel was my dear friend, but she had her secrets. She pointed the finger at Ray, probably wrote that shit in her diaries.”

“Maybe you don’t see your bias. You favored and protected Ray.”

“Ray swore he had nothing to do with Kyle’s disappearance. Rachel swore she had nothing to do with Sharon Teague’s disappearance. Frankly, I don’t know the truth, but I’m certain they both could play games and they both kept secrets.”

It was a good time to ask. “So, did either of them ever confess to you? I mean, did Ray confess to killing Sharon or Kyle?”

“No, absolutely not.”

“What about Rachel, did she confess to any crime?”

Let me put it this way. Ray accused Rachel, and she accused Ray.”

“Of what?”

“Rachel of what happened to Sharon, and Ray for what happened to Kyle.”

“Let me see if I’m understanding. You’re saying Rachel accused Ray of killing Kyle, and Ray accused Rachel of killing Sharon Teague?”

“Pretty much, other than they both believed the other had help.”

“Help from who?”

“I don’t know, but I have my suspicions.” My iPhone rang before Jane completed her statement. It was Kyla.

“Hey sis, how’s Lillian?”

What I heard felt like I was experiencing a miracle. “Get up here, Lillian just woke up.”

Jane must have noticed the shock rolling across my face like a massive wave. “What is it?”

I stood and grabbed my empty coffee cup. “Come on, Lillian’s back with us.”

The two of us weaved our way around tables, tossed our garbage in the can by the exit, and raced to the elevators that led to the ICU. All I heard Jane say as my mind alternated between happiness and worry that Lillian might have suffered brain damage was the repeated statement that I needed to talk with Jackie and Jade Frasier.

09/01/23 Biking & Listening

Biking is something else I both love and hate. It takes a lot of effort but does provide good exercise and most days over an hour to listen to a good book or podcast. I especially like having ridden.

Here’s my bike, a Rockhopper by Specialized. I purchased it November 2021 from Venture Out in Guntersville; Mike is top notch! So is the bike, and the ‘old’ man seat I salvaged from an old Walmart bike.

Here’s a link to today’s bike ride.


Something to consider if you’re not already cycling.

I encourage you to start riding a bike, no matter your age. Check out these groups:

Cycling for those aged 70+(opens in a new tab)

Solitary Cycling(opens in a new tab)

Remember,

Photo by Suzy Hazelwood on Pexels.com

Novels listened to

The Count of Monte Cristo

Amazon abstract:

On the day of his wedding, Edmond Dantès is falsely accused of treason, arrested, and imprisoned without trial in a grim island fortress off Marseilles. A fellow prisoner inspires Dantès to escape and guides him to a fortune in treasure. Dantès returns home under the pseudonym of the mysterious Count of Monte Cristo, in order to avenge himself on the men who conspired to destroy him.

The Count of Monte Cristo takes place in France, Italy, and islands in the Mediterranean during the historical events of 1815-1839: the era of the Bourbon Restoration through the reign of Louis-Philippe of France. It begins just before the Hundred Days period (when Napoleon returned to power after his exile). The historical setting is a fundamental element of the book, an adventure story primarily concerned with themes of hope, justice, vengeance, mercy, and forgiveness. It centers around a man who is wrongfully imprisoned, escapes from jail, acquires a fortune, and sets about getting revenge on those responsible for his imprisonment. However, his plans have devastating consequences for the innocent as well as the guilty.


All Your Perfects, by Colleen Hoover


Amazon abstract:

INSTANT NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER

The #1 New York Times bestselling author of It Starts with Us and It Ends with Us—whose writing is “emotionally wrenching and utterly original” (Sara Shepard, New York Times bestselling author of the Pretty Little Liars series)—delivers a tour de force novel about a troubled marriage and the one old forgotten promise that might be able to save it.

Quinn and Graham’s perfect love is threatened by their imperfect marriage. The memories, mistakes, and secrets that they have built up over the years are now tearing them apart. The one thing that could save them might also be the very thing that pushes their marriage beyond the point of repair.

All Your Perfects is a profound novel about a damaged couple whose potential future hinges on promises made in the past. This is a heartbreaking page-turner that asks: Can a resounding love with a perfect beginning survive a lifetime between two imperfect people?


Podcasts listening to


Here’s a few photos from along my pistol route:

The Boaz Stranger–Chapter 45

I spent Tuesday night and all day yesterday with Lillian. It was now early Thursday, and the first light of morning was filtering in through the closed window blinds. Dr. Mork walked in two hours before his usual rounds. After a ‘good morning’ and a few minutes reading Lillian’s chart, observing her breathing, and registering the readings from the many connected monitors, he lifted her eyelids and focused a small light on each of her pupils. According to the doctor and head ICU nurse, Stella Newsome, who accompanied him, Lillian was doing great other than being in a coma. Her vital signs were good. She simply needed to wake up. After his examination, Dr. Mork head-motioned the nurse to leave, and sat beside me in the extra chair. He expressed his firm belief Lillian would exit her coma in the next few days. When I asked why he thought this, he surprised me. He and his staff were praying for Lillian and God had assured him she was going to be okay.

To his credit, he added a factual basis: the lack of swelling and bleeding, and near-perfect electrical activity. He emphasized he had seen nothing in Lillian’s recent electroencephalogram (EEG) that would lead him to a troubling diagnosis, things like seizures, epilepsy, head injuries, dizziness, headaches, brain tumors, and sleeping problems. I asked him several nonmedical questions and offered head-nodding to his responses.

It was troublesome to hear a medical doctor, especially one board certified in both psychiatry and neurology, ground his professional opinion, in whole or in part, on something as subjective as prayer and God. Regardless of Dr. Mork’s insane beliefs and sane thinking, I hoped he was right. I missed the intimacy Lillian and I shared and couldn’t imagine my life without her.

After he left, I stood by Lillian, held her right hand, and shared in a soft whisper the hypothesis that had been forming inside my head ever since leaving Ms. Bennett’s room on Tuesday. Rachel had not accidentally found Sharon Teague’s dog tag. Ray had given it to her for safekeeping, like he had the pistol he used to kill Kyle. I suspected Rachel had knowledge of what Ray had done to the Albertville cheerleader. Possibly, Rachel assisted in her disappearance and presumed death, like I suspected she had with Kyle.

 I had just kissed Lillian’s forehead and vocalized an ‘I love you,’ when nurse Newsome reappeared. At first, she didn’t say a word, but the look on her face was sympathetic, a slight smile with soft, non-staring eyes. She walked to Lillian’s bed, opposite from where I stood. She finally spoke. “Ray Archer came last night. It was early this morning, about 2:00.”

I released Lillian’s hand after Ms. Newsome noticed. “What did he want?”

“Lee, can I call you Lee?”

“Sure, that’s my name.” My tone carried with it a tinge of smart ass. I sensed Rachel telling me, once again, ‘Honey, it’s not always what you say, but how you say it.’

“Lee, working in ICU is great training for personal observations and what they mean. I know love when I see it.”

“Are you speaking of Ray?” The nurse smiled as though my question was funny. “I’m talking about a different type of love. Ray, according to my friend Jane Fordham, loves Lillian for the benefits she provides, things like status and respectability. Oh, maybe sex on demand, but that’s not what I see in you. Lillian isn’t an object of desire. She’s your heartbeat.”

“Okay.” I paused, hoping someone would summon Nurse Newsome away. This conversation was too, well, personal.

“By the way, in response to your question, Ray asked how Lillian was doing. It might be the rumors, but I didn’t want him alone with Lillian, even if you were in the same room.”

“Why? What rumors are you speaking of?” I felt like a stranger in my hometown.

“Ray has always been a bully and is used to getting his own way. You are taking away the principal thing that gives him respectability.”

We spent another ten minutes talking. Mostly, I listened. ICU nurse Stella Newsome seemed to have a monitor connected to the entire town of Boaz. She was aware of Ray’s trouble concerning the Hunt House fire and was sympathetic to the rumor it involved him in the disappearance of Billy and Buddy James.

The moment she returned her focus to me personally, declaring her sorrow over Rachel’s death, a gruff-voiced woman paged Nurse Newsome to Room 106. Our conversation was over. Thank goodness.

I returned to the Lazy Boy and explored the Internet for over an hour searching for an appropriate gift for the two law school colleagues saving my butt during upcoming exams.

A few minutes before 8:00 PM, my iPhone vibrated. It was a text from Kyla. She and Jane had just parked and were headed inside. I both dreaded and looked forward to my second meeting with Rachel’s best friend. Yesterday, I was eager to meet and talk but Jane had some all-day thing at First Baptist Church of Christ. Today, I was reluctant. Jane’s secrecy had me on high alert, especially given what Lillian and I had found inside her house.

I’d let Kyla convince me to hear Jane out. Somehow Jane persuaded my normally skeptical sister she was serious about joining our team and seeing that Ray receives justice.

08/31/23 Biking & Listening

Biking is something else I both love and hate. It takes a lot of effort but does provide good exercise and most days over an hour to listen to a good book or podcast. I especially like having ridden.

Here’s my bike, a Rockhopper by Specialized. I purchased it November 2021 from Venture Out in Guntersville; Mike is top notch! So is the bike, and the ‘old’ man seat I salvaged from an old Walmart bike.

Here’s a link to today’s bike ride.


Something to consider if you’re not already cycling.

I encourage you to start riding a bike, no matter your age. Check out these groups:

Cycling for those aged 70+(opens in a new tab)

Solitary Cycling(opens in a new tab)

Remember,

Photo by Suzy Hazelwood on Pexels.com

Novels listened to

The Count of Monte Cristo

Amazon abstract:

On the day of his wedding, Edmond Dantès is falsely accused of treason, arrested, and imprisoned without trial in a grim island fortress off Marseilles. A fellow prisoner inspires Dantès to escape and guides him to a fortune in treasure. Dantès returns home under the pseudonym of the mysterious Count of Monte Cristo, in order to avenge himself on the men who conspired to destroy him.

The Count of Monte Cristo takes place in France, Italy, and islands in the Mediterranean during the historical events of 1815-1839: the era of the Bourbon Restoration through the reign of Louis-Philippe of France. It begins just before the Hundred Days period (when Napoleon returned to power after his exile). The historical setting is a fundamental element of the book, an adventure story primarily concerned with themes of hope, justice, vengeance, mercy, and forgiveness. It centers around a man who is wrongfully imprisoned, escapes from jail, acquires a fortune, and sets about getting revenge on those responsible for his imprisonment. However, his plans have devastating consequences for the innocent as well as the guilty.


All Your Perfects, by Colleen Hoover


Amazon abstract:

INSTANT NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER

The #1 New York Times bestselling author of It Starts with Us and It Ends with Us—whose writing is “emotionally wrenching and utterly original” (Sara Shepard, New York Times bestselling author of the Pretty Little Liars series)—delivers a tour de force novel about a troubled marriage and the one old forgotten promise that might be able to save it.

Quinn and Graham’s perfect love is threatened by their imperfect marriage. The memories, mistakes, and secrets that they have built up over the years are now tearing them apart. The one thing that could save them might also be the very thing that pushes their marriage beyond the point of repair.

All Your Perfects is a profound novel about a damaged couple whose potential future hinges on promises made in the past. This is a heartbreaking page-turner that asks: Can a resounding love with a perfect beginning survive a lifetime between two imperfect people?


Podcasts listened to


Here’s a few photos from along my pistol route:

More big drama for the Southern Baptist Executive Committee

Here’s the link to this article.

Avatar photoby CAPTAIN CASSIDY

AUG 22, 2023

Another big drama for the Southern Baptist Convention's Executive Committee
Photo by Stephen Radford on Unsplash

Overview:

Last Thursday, the Southern Baptist Convention’s top-ranked Executive Committee got a shocking bit of news about their Interim President, followed by his resignation.

The next day, they appointed a new Interim President with a strong link to its last real president, and likely some loyalty to him.

Reading Time: 5 MINUTES

The Executive Committee of the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) just can’t get away from nonstop drama. This time, it involves fabricated credentials, a swift resignation, and an equally swift replacement appointment.

At least it’s not another sex scandal!

Situation report: The Executive Committee

The SBC contains a dizzying array of groups and sub-groups. Some are seminaries, others missionary organizations, and still others part of Lifeway, the denomination’s printing-and-research arm. Others still are mostly administrative, like one offering health and life insurance to pastors and their families.

The Executive Committee rules over all of them. It sets their annual budgets and handles the day-to-day decision-making for the SBC as a whole. It is the most powerful group within the SBC, answering only, really, to its president. In a very real sense, the Executive Committee is the visible face of the SBC.

Over the past 20 years, this committee got packed full of a stalwart, ultraconservative, ultratraditionalist faction of the SBC that I’ve come to call the Old Guard. But their control began to fray in 2019, when the denomination’s staggering “Abuse of Faith” crisis made national news. Its president at the time, Ronnie Floyd, was an Old Guard power player. But rather than cooperate with outside investigations, he simply quit the job.

The committee appointed Willie McLaurin to be its Interim President.

Since then, the Executive Committee has been trying to find an official president. They organized a search committee and held a vote to confirm the candidate they’d found. Somehow—and against expectations—the vote failed. So they had to dissolve the search committee, organize a whole new one, find another candidate, and hold another vote.

Another drama has hit the Executive Committee amidst this new search.

If you’re squeamish, don’t prod beach rubble

Very suddenly last Thursday, Willie McLaurin quit. It sounds like this is another classic Southern Baptist case of a big-name leader quitting before he could be fired. But this time, there’s a lot less doubt about that being the case.

His reasons remind me a lot of the 1994 movie Renaissance Man. In it, Danny DeVito teaches English literature to some new Army recruits who are about to wash out of basic training. While he’s there, he discovers that a gifted young man in his class nurses a secret family tragedy: he doesn’t know what happened to his Army-enlisted father, who apparently died or disappeared many years earlier. DeVito decides to do this young man a favor, so he looks into the situation without clearing it with him first. Unfortunately, this help creates some very unexpected problems.

In the case of the Executive Committee, McLaurin became one of the potential candidates for its official presidency. And that meant that the search committee had to do a bunch of background checking of his resume.

One idly and innocently wonders if this kind of deep fact-checking occurs with every candidate. Obviously, nobody had ever checked McLaurin’s background out very carefully during his rise through the ranks. But now suddenly there had to be a full background investigation like he was running for the United States presidency or something.

A wild resignation appears!

Regardless of the answer to that idle, innocent question, the search committee discovered that McLaurin had faked his educational credentials.

He’d lied.

He had told them that he’d earned degrees from North Carolina Central University, Duke University Divinity School, and Hood Theological Seminary. Alas, none of those schools corroborated his claims. I don’t know if he dropped out or simply never attended them at all. It seems to be a mixture of both. But he definitely didn’t earn degrees from any of them.

In fact, he’d even submitted fake diplomas to bolster his false claims.

Apparently, the other Executive Committee officers confronted McLaurin with their findings. He admitted that he’d lied, then resigned.

The Executive Committee quickly appointed a new Interim President

Moving with surprising speed, the next day the Executive Committee appointed Jonathan Howe as its new Interim President.

In September 2019, Jonathan Howe became the committee’s Vice President of Communications. He’s been there ever since. Though he’s quiet by SBC leadership standards, he’s popped up twice in my writing:

Just a few months before he landed his Executive Committee position, Howe appeared on a podcast with Thom Rainer. At the time, Rainer himself was just about to retire-before-he-got-fired. They were talking about the various ways that church congregations disappoint and frustrate their pastors. To put it very mildly, Howe revealed a lot of damning contradictions to evangelicals’ fanciful claims about their churches. But then, so did Rainer.

Then, in 2021, he shows up in one of the two emails that Russell Moore leaked as he was quitting-before-he-could-be-fired. Moore headed the SBC’s Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC). Interestingly, Moore didn’t particularly praise Howe in that email. Moore just said that when he told Howe that he’d be talking about the sex abuse crisis at the ERLC’s Caring Well Conference in October 2019, Howe was fine with it.

It now makes sense that Moore might have told Howe that. As VP of Communications, Howe handled the various news sites related to SBC doings, like Baptist Press itself. Howe presumably would know if Moore’s plan would be a public-relations disaster.

Whither now, Executive Committee?

Jonathan Howe is apparently a Ronnie Floyd appointee. In fact, Floyd himself recommended Howe for the role, held a conference call with the other committee officers, and confirmed his appointment then and there. Given what a deeply polarized and tribalistic bunch the Old Guard are, it’s hard to imagine Floyd going to that kind of trouble for anyone in the Old Guard’s enemy faction, which I call the Pretend Progressives.

Moore was a Pretend Progressive. The last few SBC Presidents have been as well: J.D. Greear, Ed Litton, and now Bart Barber. They are slowly making steps toward reforming the denomination and resolving that sex abuse crisis, and they’re nowhere near as rigidly regressive or misogynistic as the Old Guard.

That said, don’t make the mistake of thinking they’re really progressive. They aren’t. They keep making the mistake of thinking they can maintain rigid gender roles, their culture wars against human rights, and dysfunctional authoritarian social structures throughout the denomination, while still keeping out all the scandals and hypocrisy that keep popping up in their ranks.

The vote that the Executive Committee held this past May involved a candidate who should have appealed to both factions, Jared Wellman. Even the nastiest Old Guard leaders had nothing bad to say about him. In fact, he’d really seemed like a shoo-in. But at the last second, the vote to confirm him failed.

McLaurin himself seems to lean Pretend Progressive as well. He certainly seemed to approve of various courses of action that the Old Guard condemned, like publicly releasing a formerly-top-secret database of accused and confirmed sex abusers in SBC churches. That move seemed to set the Old Guard off like rockets!

So to me, it looks like the Old Guard is not prepared yet to give up the most powerful role in the denomination. Presidents? Oh, they come and go. Every year there’s a vote for the SBC presidency. It’s dizzying to watch them go through the revolving door!

But Executive Committee Presidents are a different duck entirely. They seem to wield the real power behind the throne. The resolution of the entire sex abuse crisis might hinge on whoever gets the role, and there are lots of other faction squabbles that the person in this role will inevitably shape. If I found out that the Old Guard had anything to do with McLaurin’s resignation, like slipping a rumor to the background checkers, then I wouldn’t be surprised at all.

If Jonathan Howe is careful, he might just end up in Ronnie Floyd’s old office one day soon.